Friday, June 28, 2013

Warning: DO NOT ATTEMPT TO DEAL w. Mills Search International Incorporated



Social Engineering / SCAM Alert !!

Dear QA Analysts and People Abroad, I'm normally not a big fan of calling fraudulent actions out on public forums, but this one is heinous on multiple levels ... and worse, because I too was taken.
I preface this by stating that it is despicable beyond words that there are some who would take advantage of others, and go to great lengths to exploit a basic need like getting job to support a family or pay for needed expenses (medical, or otherwise).

We don't need foreign terrorists when we have these people lurking. They ought to get the worst of punishments.

It starts with an e-mail ...

The initial phase of the scam takes place in the form of an e-mail sent to you from a "Mr. R. Giles" ... a person I cannot guarantee as legitimate (or real) for that matter. This person send you an e-mail stating that he's writing in response to an ad you responded to on some job board. If you're like me, you've lost track. So you reply.

Then comes the urgent call-to-action ...

A follow-up e-mail is sent to you stating if you're still interested to respond with additional steps. Keep in mind, other than the request to purchase a book (which didn't seem like a terrible thing - for $20), there was no real financial commitment.

There was a pre-qualifying test to take - about 100 questions - that were relevant to the position of interest. Again, I'm a fairly intelligent person and the questions asked were very on-point with what one would expect for a position of interest.

References required ...

Here's where things may start to take a turn. This fictitious person requires a listing of references. Typical of any agency, they ask for a resume, references, etc. There's nothing on my resume that I should be afraid of being tampered with, but there are former employers and other tid bits of information that could be used for good or ill.

The references is again, a typical ask. But in hindsight, this is means by which this $%^& spreads the maliciousness.

Finally, the site fails ...

So after a couple of days when I hear nothing back regarding my test results, references, or where I'm even at in the process I send an e-mail. The e-mail bounces. I give it the benefit of the doubt as it could be a host of different issues. I try again, same effect! Now I'm pissed for getting taken.

I check the website, and suddenly its down. Guessing distinct IPs get blocked once the scam is completed. Well played, #$%^& ! Well played!

 Lesson Learned

In the quest to better my station and move upward, I was faced with a very insidious and clever ruse. I send this out to all who may read this, beware of this. But don't take my word for it ... click these links and do your diligence, as I should have done.


Wednesday, June 26, 2013

7 Reasons Why QA Is Difficult

7 Reasons Why QA is Difficult

 Click here to read the article

Blogger's Note: I cannot and will not claim credit for this article ... I am merely passing it along as it is a brilliantly written piece on what QA goes through.

Enjoy!

QA Tool: Push Notification Debugger for iOS Apps

iOS App Developers and QA

I recently came across this by way of my linked feed and I wanted to share it with you all.

To be honest, I've not completely reviewed this myself as I'm not a developer and push notifications that we do test are done client-side (via the app), so I cannot attest to its viability .. but here goes!

https://github.com/blommegard/APNS-Pusher

Monday, June 3, 2013

Using new technology to watch porn .. seriously?!


"Nothin' like porn in the morn"

We are doomed as a society when we reduce the most advanced technology to a new means of watching porn. I'm not one to judge .. by any means. But honestly, is this necessary?

Read the article, voice your opinion

QA Humor: The wrong way to ensure quality


Original story, click here

Saturday, June 1, 2013

Lessons Learned: What Agile QA has taught me

What Agile Means to Quality

For Agile, there really is no 1 set of ways to go about it. If you're used to Waterfall, Agile is just a more "compressed" version. 

While you may get different opinions, these few things hold true:








"Garbage In, Garbage Out"

Good testing starts with a good process. That means you have an Entrance Criteria, Process Document, and Exit Criteria, as well as a Sign-Off Document prior to delivery of your project.

"The Right Tools"

As QA, you need to ensure the documents and tools you are using are concise and relevant. Check that they are up-to-date, finalized, and located in a centralized spot that everyone can access.

"Agile Doesn't Mean Sloppy" 

That means all players are responsible for their contribution; when designers or developers are careless, testing will drag.

"Quality isn't everything, its the only thing"

Don't be afraid to call out anything, or anyone, that interferes with your efforts (unless its a management decision).

"Be Thorough, Be Patient"

Do not let ridiculous deadlines, or shifted priorities, circumvent your testing efforts.

"Can't Catch 'Em All!"

There will always be a bug or two that gets away from you when you go live. From my experience, its your job to catch the biggest ones and report even the tiniest ones. More often than not, these teeny ones will be baked in towards an update.

"Don't Hate, Congratulate!"

Testing can be trying at times, but I can't stress it enough how important it is to pat your designer or developer on the back when the job gets done, or when they're doing well. Always lend a hand if you can to ensure they're doing their job to the best of their abilities.

"Do What You Love, Love What You Do!"

Last but not least, smile and make your job fun. Testing is tedious, but that doesn't mean you can't get creative and make the task more enjoyable.